Extending Context Size in Language Models

Language models have revolutionized the way we interact with artificial intelligence systems. However, one of the challenges faced is the limited context size that affects the model's understanding and response capabilities.

In the realm of natural language processing, attention matrices play a crucial role in determining the influence of each token within a given context. This cross-correlation matrix, often represented as an NxN matrix, affects the overall model size and performance.

One possible approach to overcome the context size limitation is by summarizing larger MxM matrices (where M > N) into an NxN matrix. This can involve replacing large paragraphs of text with concise summaries, allowing for cross-correlation of these summaries instead of analyzing lengthy paragraphs individually.

However, unfolding these summaries to retrieve the correlation poses a challenge. Similar to how our eyes perceive the 3D world as a projection, we can represent the 3D space as a 2D manifold. By employing suitable stigmatization methods, AI models can explicitly mark these summaries as summaries and be trained to expand and fold them as needed, using specialized tokens such as "expand(id)" and "fold(id)" temporarily inserted into the context.

It's worth noting that the limitation in context size is actively being addressed. Two primary factors contribute to this limitation. Firstly, open-source models, including LLMs, have been trained on a context size of 2k tokens. However, there is no technical constraint preventing larger context sizes. Training models with larger context windows is an ongoing effort to overcome this limitation. Recent progress has been made, and announcements have been made regarding this development.

The second factor is the RAM usage. As context size increases, so does the RAM requirement. While some models have been trained on larger context windows, such as MPT StoryWriter trained on 65k context windows, running them requires powerful machines due to the scaling RAM usage. This poses a challenge for most consumer machines.

Efforts are underway to address the context size issue. GPT-4-32K is an API-based option that offers larger context sizes, although it comes at a higher cost. Researchers and developers are actively working to extend and optimize context length, ensuring that it remains a topic of focus.

It's essential to appreciate the progress made in the field of language models. The ability to submit lengthy prompts to models with billions of parameters and receive responses within seconds is a testament to the technical marvel AI has become. Furthermore, future advancements could involve models being trained in real-time, integrating every interaction seamlessly into the model's memory or fine-tuning layer.

While the context size limitation may seem like a significant roadblock from a user perspective, it's crucial to understand that development is happening at a rapid pace. Tools and software optimizations are being developed to address this limitation, and it's only a matter of time before these obstacles are overcome.

On a final note, data augmentation is an area of research that is being actively explored. It offers potential solutions to the context length issue. Techniques like fine-tuning models, implementing retrieval-augmented generation using text embeddings and vector stores, or utilizing landmark attention to expand context windows are being investigated.

Addressing the context size challenge requires collaboration between researchers, developers, and the user community. As the field progresses, we can anticipate more accessible and optimized solutions that unlock the full potential of language models.

Tags: AI, Language Models, Context Size, Attention Matrices, Summarization, Cross-correlation, 2D Manifold, Training Models, RAM Usage, GPT-4-32K, Data Augmentation, Fine-tuning, Retrieval-augmented Generation, Text Embeddings, Vector Stores, Landmark Attention

Relevant Links:

Max Context and Memory Constraints in Bigger Models

One common question that arises when discussing bigger language models is whether there is a drop-off in maximum context due to memory constraints. In this blog post, we'll explore this topic and shed some light on it.

Bigger models, such as GPT-3.5, have been developed to handle a vast amount of information and generate coherent and contextually relevant responses. However, the size of these models does not necessarily dictate the maximum context they can handle.

The memory constraints … click here to read

Reimagining Language Models with Minimalist Approach

The recent surge in interest for smaller language models is a testament to the idea that size isn't everything when it comes to intelligence. Models today are often filled with a plethora of information, but what if we minimized this to create a model that only understands and writes in a single language, yet knows little about the world? This concept is the foundation of the new wave of "tiny" language models .

A novel … click here to read

Building Language Models for Low-Resource Languages

As the capabilities of language models continue to advance, it is conceivable that "one-size-fits-all" model will remain as the main paradigm. For instance, given the vast number of languages worldwide, many of which are low-resource, the prevalent practice is to pretrain a single model on multiple languages. In this paper, the researchers introduce the Sabiá: Portuguese Large Language Models and demonstrate that monolingual pretraining on the target language significantly improves models already extensively trained on diverse corpora. Few-shot evaluations … click here to read

Navigating Language Models: A Practical Overview of Recommendations and Community Insights

Language models play a pivotal role in various applications, and the recent advancements in models like Falcon-7B, Mistral-7B, and Zephyr-7B are transforming the landscape of natural language processing. In this guide, we'll delve into some noteworthy models and their applications.

Model Recommendations

When it comes to specific applications, the choice of a language model can make a significant difference. Here are … click here to read

Local Language Models: A User Perspective

Many users are exploring Local Language Models (LLMs) not because they outperform ChatGPT/GPT4, but to learn about the technology, understand its workings, and personalize its capabilities and features. Users have been able to run several models, learn about tokenizers and embeddings , and experiment with vector databases . They value the freedom and control over the information they seek, without ideological or ethical restrictions imposed by Big Tech. … click here to read

Re-Pre-Training Language Models for Low-Resource Languages

Language models are initially pre-trained on a huge corpus of mostly-unfiltered text in the target languages, then they are made into ChatLLMs by fine-tuning on a prompt dataset. The pre-training is the most expensive part by far, and if existing LLMs can't do basic sentences in your language, then one needs to start from that point by finding/scraping/making a huge dataset. One can exhaustively go through every available LLM and check its language abilities before investing in re-pre-training. There are surprisingly many of them … click here to read

Transforming LLMs with Externalized World Knowledge

The concept of externalizing world knowledge to make language models more efficient has been gaining traction in the field of AI. Current LLMs are equipped with enormous amounts of data, but not all of it is useful or relevant. Therefore, it is important to offload the "facts" and allow LLMs to focus on language and reasoning skills. One potential solution is to use a vector database to store world knowledge.

However, some have questioned the feasibility of this approach, as it may … click here to read

Comparing Large Language Models: WizardLM 7B, Alpaca 65B, and More

A recent comparison of large language models, including WizardLM 7B , Alpaca 65B , Vicuna 13B, and others, showcases their performance across various tasks. The analysis highlights how the models perform despite their differences in parameter count. The GPT4-X-Alpaca 30B model, for instance, gets close to the performance of Alpaca 65B. Furthermore, the Vicuna 13B and 7B models demonstrate impressive results, given their lower parameter numbers.

Some users … click here to read

Popular Posts